10 Bobcat Tractor and Loader Models to Avoid in 2025

Bobcat is a name synonymous with compact equipment excellence, particularly in the realm of skid steers, compact tractors, and track loaders. The brand is widely known for its innovative designs, durability, and versatility across construction, agriculture, and landscaping. But like all manufacturers, not every Bobcat model has lived up to expectations.

Whether due to design flaws, poor performance in specific applications, or customer-reported reliability concerns, some models have proven to be less than ideal—especially when compared to competing equipment or even other Bobcat models. In this article, we’ll analyze 10 Bobcat models that you might want to avoid in 2025, along with technical insights, real-world user feedback, and better alternatives.

🔧 Why Do Some Bobcat Models Underperform?

The most common reasons Bobcat equipment falls short include:

• Undersized engines for heavy-duty applications
• Transmission or hydrostatic drive issues
• Problematic Tier 4 emissions systems
• Insufficient hydraulic power for demanding attachments
• Operator comfort and control layout complaints
• Limited parts availability or high service costs
• Early production run defects not fully addressed

Here’s a concise 300-word overview covering general and series-wise problems across Bobcat tractors and loaders:

Common Bobcat Tractor and Loader Problems (Series-Wise Overview)

Bobcat equipment is widely respected for compact power and versatility, but like all machinery, certain recurring issues appear across specific series. Whether you’re using a Bobcat compact tractor, skid-steer, or track loader, being aware of these potential pitfalls can save time and money.

CT Series (Compact Tractors)

• CT1025, CT120, CT122: Early models are often underpowered for modern tasks, with weak loader capacities and limited hydraulic output. Some users report frequent PTO disengagement, fragile 3-point linkages, and transmission noise.
• CT225/CT235: Prone to Tier 4 emissions system failures—especially DPF clogging during light-duty use. Many parts were hard to source during Bobcat’s brief exit from the tractor market (2013–2019).
• Newer CT20–40 Series: Improved overall, but still face regen cycle issues, especially when used at low RPMs or for short jobs.

S Series (Skid-Steer Loaders)

• S70, S100: These ultra-compact units lack the power and lift needed for most jobs today. They can feel unstable and underpowered, with minimal cab comfort.
• S450 (early units): Known for cooling issues, fuel delivery faults, and electrical sensor problems in models from 2016–2018.

T Series (Track Loaders)

• T595: A powerful machine, but suffers from hydraulic overheating, frequent DPF regens, and in some cases, hydraulic pump failures under 1,000 hours.
• T180 (legacy): Outdated belt-driven systems, jerky controls, and high maintenance compared to newer R-Series models.

Excavators (E-Series)

• E35 Gen 1: Swing motor failures and short hydraulic service intervals frustrate many owners.

Tip: Always cross-reference your model’s year and serial number with recall notices and service bulletins. Some problems are model-specific, while others are tied to early production runs.

🚫 1. Bobcat CT1025 Sub-Compact Tractor

Why to Avoid:
The CT1025, despite being compact and affordable, struggles with underpowered performance. Its 25 HP engine is barely sufficient for most attachments beyond basic mowing. Loader capacity is severely limited, and its light weight makes it unstable on slopes or rough terrain.

Common Complaints:

• Poor loader lift (below 800 lbs)
• Transmission whining under load
• Overheating when mowing thick brush

Better Alternative:
CT2035 or CT2040 – These offer better hydraulic flow, more stable operation, and support a wider range of implements.

🚫 2. Bobcat CT225 (Discontinued but Still Circulating Used)

Why to Avoid:
The CT225 was a mid-sized compact tractor that suffered from early Tier 4 emissions bugs and premature injector failure. Many owners also reported poor dealer support and limited access to parts after Bobcat briefly exited the compact tractor market in 2013–2014.

Known Issues:

• DPF clogging at low hours
• Poor cold starts
• Intermittent electrical errors

Better Alternative:
CT2540 or CT4055 – Better design, current parts support, and updated emissions systems with fewer software glitches.

🚫 3. Bobcat CT120 (Legacy Model)

Why to Avoid:
A legacy model from Bobcat’s first entry into tractors (pre-2010), the CT120 had a weak 20 HP engine, slow hydraulics, and a problematic transmission that many users replaced early.

Common Problems:

• PTO disengagement under load
• Steering linkage wear
• Weak hydraulic pressure (less than 5.5 GPM)

Better Alternative:
CT2025 (2025 model) – Slightly larger footprint, stronger hydraulics, modern emissions compliance, and better traction with optional 4WD.

🚫 4. Bobcat E35 (Gen 1 Mini Excavator)

Why to Avoid:
The first generation E35 had excellent reach and maneuverability, but suffered from swing motor failures, weak bucket breakout force, and poor visibility from the cab.

User Complaints:

• Electrical gremlins
• Track derailing on uneven terrain
• Short service intervals

Better Alternative:
E35 Gen 2 (R2 Series) – Offers advanced hydraulics, upgraded joystick controls, and a redesigned cab with better operator comfort.

🚫 5. Bobcat S70 Skid-Steer Loader

Why to Avoid:
The S70 is incredibly compact, but its limited horsepower (23 HP) and rated operating capacity (just 760 lbs) make it impractical for most modern worksites. It’s also not compatible with most high-demand hydraulic tools.

Why It Fails Today:

• Easily bogged down
• No enclosed cab option
• Poor resale value

Better Alternative:
S450 – Still compact, but much more capable, with over 1,300 lbs ROC and improved stability.

🚫 6. Bobcat T595 Compact Track Loader

Why to Avoid:
While popular at launch, the T595 developed a reputation for hydraulic overheat issues under heavy use and DPF regeneration problems, especially in cold climates or intermittent work.

Technical Concerns:

• Poor cooling system design
• Long forced regen cycles
• Hydraulic pump failure at under 1,000 hours (reported cases)

Better Alternative:
T66 R-Series – Updated cooling systems, better cab insulation, and higher breakout force with optimized loader linkage.

🚫 7. Bobcat CT122 Compact Tractor

Why to Avoid:
The CT122 was part of the early tractor line shared with Kioti, but had design quirks including unstable loader geometry, fragile three-point hitch components, and frequent ECU sensor errors.

Reported Weak Points:

• FEL pin shear under moderate load
• 3PH actuator failure
• Narrow stance with poor balance

Better Alternative:
CT2035 – Still compact, but a true step up in build quality and hydraulic power.

🚫 8. Bobcat S450 (Early Units 2016–2018)

Why to Avoid:
Early production runs of the S450 experienced issues with engine cooling and fuel pump faults. These were later corrected, but if you’re buying used, models from 2016–2018 should be double-checked.

Known Issues:

• Frequent overheating in dusty conditions
• Fuel delivery hesitation
• Fragile plastic fuel tanks

Better Alternative:
S510 – Similar dimensions with stronger engine performance and better hydraulic capacity.

🚫 9. Bobcat T180 (Legacy Model)

Why to Avoid:
Though once a workhorse, the T180 lacks many of the refinements found in newer machines. Users cite jerky controls, uncomfortable ride, and complex drive maintenance.

Legacy Drawbacks:

• Belt-driven drive system wears quickly
• Loader arm slop
• Harsh ride on hard ground

Better Alternative:
T62 or T64 R-Series – Vastly improved suspension, cab comfort, and hydraulic output.

🚫 10. Bobcat S100 Skid-Steer Loader

Why to Avoid:
The S100 fills a narrow niche—too big for ultra-tight spots, too underpowered for standard jobsite use. With low ROC and top-heavy balance, it’s frequently bypassed in favor of more versatile models.

User Feedback:

• Constant bucket tip with wet material
• Hard starting in cold weather
• Loud cab with no climate control

Better Alternative:
S510 or S590 – More refined, similar dimensions, but greater reliability and jobsite versatility.

📊 Summary Table – Bobcat Models to Avoid in 2025

🧠 Final Buying Tips for Bobcat Equipment in 2025

1. Check for Production Years
   Early units of some models (like S450, CT225) have known defects later corrected. Always verify serial numbers and service history.
2. Understand Your Workload
   A CT1025 might be fine for residential mowing—but not for gravel hauling. Match HP, hydraulics, and lift specs to your toughest job.
3. Ask About Regen Cycle Needs
   Newer Bobcats use DPF. If you’re not running the machine hard or long enough, you’ll see frequent forced regens or errors.
4. Always Inspect Used Equipment
   Look for: hydraulic leaks, uneven track wear, engine smoke, and loader slop. Ask for full service records, especially on older or recalled units.
5. Verify Dealer Support
   Some discontinued models (CT225, CT120) may no longer be supported with OEM parts or updated software.

Conclusion: Not All Bobcats Are Built Equal

While Bobcat remains a trusted and innovative name in compact machinery, there are certain models—and specific production years—you’d do well to avoid in 2025. Whether due to underpowered engines, poor hydraulics, emissions headaches, or early production bugs, these 10 models stand out as potential red flags for buyers.

That said, many newer models in the R-Series, CT4000, and T-Series lineup show tremendous improvement in reliability, performance, and operator comfort. By doing your homework, checking serial ranges, and staying updated on service bulletins, you’ll ensure your Bobcat investment truly performs like one.

Let me know if you’d like a PDF version, a blog-formatted layout, or visuals (like tables, comparison charts, or images) for this article.

David Holtzman

I’m David man behind Lawn Mowerly; I’ve been dealing with lawnmowers and Tractors with my father since I was a kid. I know every make and model and what each one is capable of and love helping people find the perfect equipment for their needs.